DIPAK SHIVSHANKAR TRIVEDI vs DECD. ASHA KAMATH THROUGH LHR SANGEETA RANE Advocate - MR NIRAD D BUCH( — CRA/595/2025
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 115. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240704062025
Filing Number
CRA/30493/2025
Filing Date
26-Sep-2025
Registration No
CRA/595/2025
Registration Date
06-Oct-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
272-SJ - CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 ( 272 )
Sub-Category
1226-SJ - CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 - REJECTION OF THE PLAINT UNDER - ORDER - 7 RULE 11 ( 1226 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIPAK SHIVSHANKAR TRIVEDI
Adv. MR BJ TRIVEDI(
-
2.,MS JIGNASA B TRIVEDI(
-
3.,MS JIGNASA B TRIVEDI(
-
4., ,MS JIGNASA B TRIVEDI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.DECD. ASHA KAMATH THROUGH LHR SANGEETA RANE Advocate - MR NIRAD D BUCH(
-
2., ,MRS. BHAVINI N. BUCH(
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
24-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
23-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Gujarat allowed the Civil Revision Application, staying the counter-claim of adverse possession and permitting the plaintiff Dipak Shivshankar Trivedi to proceed with the main suit for recovery of possession. The court found that since the plaintiff purchased the property in 2024, an adverse possession plea against him is questionable and requires further consideration at trial. The trial court is directed to decide separately on the defendant's application to implead the previous owner as a party in the counter-claim based on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
23-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
22-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
21-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
13-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
07-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
27-Mar-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
12-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice J. C. Doshi
-
06-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Ashutosh Shastri,honourable Mr. Justice J. C. DoshiView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice J. C. Doshi
-
22-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Ashutosh Shastri,honourable Mr. Justice J. C. Doshi
-
04-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Ashutosh Shastri,honourable Mr. Justice J. C. DoshiView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
115-Urgent Admission (Adjounred Matters)
Honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker
-
08-Oct-2025
Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen,honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker
-
07-Oct-2025
Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen,honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thakerView PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker
-
06-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/595/2025
Case Summary The High Court of Gujarat allowed the Civil Revision Application, staying the counter-claim of adverse possession and permitting the plaintiff Dipak Shivshankar Trivedi to proceed with the main suit for recovery of possession. The court found that since the plaintiff purchased the property in 2024, an adverse possession plea against him is questionable and requires further consideration at trial. The trial court is directed to decide separately on the defendant's application to implead the previous owner as a party in the counter-claim based on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts