N.D.SHAH vs BANK OF BARODA Advocate - MR DARSHAN M PARIKH( — SCA/9271/2006

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH on 06th March 2019.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Dec-2005

CNR: GJHC240527782006

Filing Number

SCA/

Filing Date

21-Sep-2005

Registration No

SCA/9271/2006

Registration Date

21-Sep-2005

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

506-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE ( 506 )

Sub-Category

1530-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE - REMOVAL ( 1530 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

06-Mar-2019

Nature of Disposal

Contested--39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.D.SHAH

    Adv. MR AR MAJMUDAR(

  2. 2.,MR NK MAJMUDAR(

  3. 3.,MR NK MAJMUDAR(

  4. 4., ,MR NK MAJMUDAR(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF BARODA Advocate - MR DARSHAN M PARIKH(

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  3. 10-Jan-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  4. 18-Oct-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  5. 30-Aug-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  6. 19-Jul-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  7. 03-May-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  8. 16-Feb-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  9. 08-Sep-2023

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  10. 19-Jun-2023

    Honourable Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi,honourable Mr. Justice Rajendra M. Sareen

  11. 07-Jun-2023

    Honourable Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi,honourable Mr. Justice Rajendra M. Sareen

  12. 07-Jun-2023

    Honourable Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi,honourable Mr. Justice Rajendra M. Sareen

  13. 15-Sep-2022

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje

  14. 06-Mar-2019

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. SupehiaView PDF

    Summary: The Gujarat High Court dismissed N.D. Shah's petition challenging his removal from Bank of Baroda, upholding the disciplinary proceedings as fair and legally proper. The court held that criminal acquittal does not vitiate a domestic inquiry conducted independently under different standards of proof (criminal proceedings require "beyond reasonable doubt" while domestic inquiries require "preponderance of probabilities"), and the punishment was proportionate to the serious charges of financial irregularities, unauthorized loan sanctions, and breach of trust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 06-Mar-2019

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Paresh Upadhyay

  16. 18-Feb-2019

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Paresh Upadhyay

  17. 18-Jan-2019

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Ashutosh Shastri

  18. 27-Dec-2018

    Honourable Mr. Justice Ashutosh ShastriView PDF

  19. 27-Dec-2018

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Ashutosh Shastri

  20. 13-Dec-2018

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  21. 01-Nov-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  22. 12-Sep-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  23. 10-Sep-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  24. 24-Jul-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  25. 02-May-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  26. 10-Apr-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  27. 27-Mar-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  28. 05-Mar-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  29. 05-Mar-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  30. 23-Feb-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  31. 09-Feb-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  32. 05-Feb-2018

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  33. 06-Dec-2017

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  34. 06-Nov-2017

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  35. 18-Sep-2017

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  36. 22-Aug-2017

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  37. 17-Jul-2017

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  38. 06-Jul-2017

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice J.b.pardiwala

  39. 10-Jun-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice J.b.pardiwala

  40. 28-Apr-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Z.k.saiyed

  41. 07-Apr-2016

    Honourable Mr. Justice Z.k.saiyedView PDF

  42. 07-Apr-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  43. 31-Mar-2016

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thakerView PDF

  44. 31-Mar-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  45. 18-Mar-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  46. 09-Mar-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  47. 24-Feb-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  48. 12-Feb-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  49. 10-Feb-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  50. 01-Feb-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  51. 20-Jan-2016

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  52. 07-Jan-2016

    189-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  53. 16-Dec-2015

    189-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker

  54. 08-Dec-2015

    189-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Paresh Upadhyay

  55. 21-Oct-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable The Chief Justice Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani

  56. 22-Sep-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable The Chief Justice Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani

  57. 21-Aug-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice J.b.pardiwala

  58. 03-Jul-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable The Chief Justice Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani

  59. 01-May-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable The Chief Justice Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani

  60. 10-Apr-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable The Chief Justice Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani

  61. 24-Mar-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable The Chief Justice Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani

  62. 12-Mar-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  63. 03-Feb-2015

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice G.r.udhwani

  64. 03-Jul-2014

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  65. 01-May-2014

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  66. 21-Apr-2014

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  67. 25-Mar-2014

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable The Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice A.j.desai

  68. 05-Dec-2013

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  69. 26-Sep-2013

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  70. 27-Aug-2013

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  71. 05-Jul-2013

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  72. 18-Jun-2013

    182-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  73. 12-Jun-2013

    187-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice C.L. Soni

  74. 01-May-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  75. 21-Sep-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCA/9271/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Gujarat High Court dismissed N.D. Shah's petition challenging his removal from Bank of Baroda, upholding the disciplinary proceedings as fair and legally proper. The court held that criminal acquittal does not vitiate a domestic inquiry conducted independently under different standards of proof (criminal proceedings require "beyond reasonable doubt" while domestic inquiries require "preponderance of probabilities"), and the punishment was proportionate to the serious charges of financial irregularities, unauthorized loan sanctions, and breach of trust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case