BRIJESH GAUTAM KUMAR DAVE vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP( — SCA/10587/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240468472024
Filing Number
SCA/20632/2024
Filing Date
12-Jul-2024
Registration No
SCA/10587/2024
Registration Date
18-Jul-2024
Judge
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Coram
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
331-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 ( 331 )
Sub-Category
1301-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 - N.A. USE PERMISSION (S.65A) ( 1301 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJESH GAUTAM KUMAR DAVE
Adv. AISHVARYA(
-
2.,N R MEHTA(
-
3.,N R MEHTA(
-
4., ,N R MEHTA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(
-
2.COLLECTOR
-
3.MAMLATDAR AND ALT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-May-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
23-Apr-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court allowed the petitioner's petition, quashing orders dated 26.12.2023 and 03.07.2024 that blocked his Non-Agricultural (NA) land use permission. The court held that Section 65 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code only requires the applicant to be an occupant/owner of the land, not that their predecessor had valid agricultural status. Since the petitioner purchased the land via registered sale deed and holds agricultural status himself, his NA application must be reconsidered on merits regardless of pending tenancy proceedings involving the previous owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
21-Apr-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
20-Apr-2026
157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
17-Apr-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
10-Apr-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
30-Mar-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
24-Mar-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
23-Feb-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
05-Feb-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
29-Jan-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
22-Jan-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
13-Jan-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
06-Jan-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi
-
14-Nov-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi
-
10-Nov-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
14-Oct-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
09-Oct-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
03-Oct-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
26-Aug-2025
106-For Hearing At 4:00 P.M.
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
08-Aug-2025
106-For Hearing At 4:00 P.M.
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
18-Jul-2025
106-For Hearing At 4:00 P.M.
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
30-Jun-2025
106-For Hearing At 4:00 P.M.
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
16-Jun-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. MayeeView PDF
-
16-Jun-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
04-Apr-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
21-Mar-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
21-Feb-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
21-Jan-2025
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
20-Dec-2024
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
03-Dec-2024
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
08-Oct-2024
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
26-Sep-2024
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
12-Sep-2024
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
22-Aug-2024
182-For Final Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
16-Aug-2024
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
01-Aug-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. KarielView PDF
-
01-Aug-2024
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
30-Jul-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. KarielView PDF
-
30-Jul-2024
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
29-Jul-2024
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
23-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/10587/2024
Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court allowed the petitioner's petition, quashing orders dated 26.12.2023 and 03.07.2024 that blocked his Non-Agricultural (NA) land use permission. The court held that Section 65 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code only requires the applicant to be an occupant/owner of the land, not that their predecessor had valid agricultural status. Since the petitioner purchased the land via registered sale deed and holds agricultural status himself, his NA application must be reconsidered on merits regardless of pending tenancy proceedings involving the previous owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts