DENISH S/O RAMESHBHAI SURTI THRO TUSHAR S/O CHIRAGBHAI KHAMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/8361/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 21,22,226. Status: 194-For Final Hearing. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240438722026
Filing Number
SCR.A/25556/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/8361/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Ms. Justice Gita Gopi , Honourable Mr.justice L. S. Pirzada
Coram
Honourable Ms. Justice Gita Gopi , Honourable Mr.justice L. S. Pirzada
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
3011-DB - DETENTION - PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 ( 3011 )
Sub-Category
4-DB - DETENTION - PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 - PRO-DETENTION - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DENISH S/O RAMESHBHAI SURTI THRO TUSHAR S/O CHIRAGBHAI KHAMAR
Adv. MR. KISHAN H DAIYA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.POLICE COMMISIONER
-
3.JAIL SUPERINTENDENT
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jul-2026
194-For Final Hearing
Honourable Ms. Justice Gita Gopi , Honourable Mr.justice L. S. Pirzada
-
19-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief Justice Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani,honourable Ms. Justice Gita GopiView PDF
Case Summary: In Special Criminal Application No. 8361/2026 before the Gujarat High Court, the bench of Justice Gita Gopi and Justice L. S. Pirzada adjourned the case. The rule was made returnable on 16.07.2026, with the learned APP waiving service of notice on behalf of the Respondent-State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCR.A/8361/2026
Case Summary: In Special Criminal Application No. 8361/2026 before the Gujarat High Court, the bench of Justice Gita Gopi and Justice L. S. Pirzada adjourned the case. The rule was made returnable on 16.07.2026, with the learned APP waiving service of notice on behalf of the Respondent-State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts