SOHEB SIDHIK MOKHA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/8132/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240434662026
Filing Number
SCA/18202/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
SCA/8132/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
394-SJ - NON-SERVICE - GUJARAT PANCHAYATS ACT, 1993 ( 394 )
Sub-Category
1434-SJ - NON-SERVICE - GUJARAT PANCHAYATS ACT, 1993 - DEMOLITION AND ENCHROACHMENT ( 1434 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOHEB SIDHIK MOKHA
Adv. KUSHAL A DESAI(
-
2.,MR. ISHAN VARYANI(
-
3.,MR. ISHAN VARYANI(
-
4., ,MR. ISHAN VARYANI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.TALATI-CUM-MANTRI, NANA VARNORA GRAM PANCHAYAT
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
3.THE NANA VARNORA GRAM PANCHAYAT
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. KarielView PDF
Case Summary: SCA/8132/2026 In this Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court, the court granted the petitioner's draft amendment to be carried out immediately. Notice was issued to respondents with a return date of 19.06.2026; the Assistant Government Pleader waived service on behalf of the State, while direct service on respondents 2 and 3 was permitted today. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/8132/2026
Case Summary: SCA/8132/2026 In this Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court, the court granted the petitioner's draft amendment to be carried out immediately. Notice was issued to respondents with a return date of 19.06.2026; the Assistant Government Pleader waived service on behalf of the State, while direct service on respondents 2 and 3 was permitted today. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts