MAHESH BODURAM YADAV vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/13545/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Status: 125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240434512026
Filing Number
CR.MA/25254/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/13545/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. Thakker
Coram
Honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. Thakker
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
2 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF COMPLAINT ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH BODURAM YADAV
Adv. MR PREMAL S RACHH(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.HIRENBHAI HITESHBHAI PINDARIYA
Case History
-
27-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Jul-2026
125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. Thakker
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Umesh A. Trivedi,honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. ThakkerView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Gujarat granted ad-interim relief to petitioner Mahesh Boduram Yadav, a 28-year-old enrolled advocate, in his petition challenging a complaint filed against him under BNS sections 242, 319, and the Advocate Act section 45. The petitioner had assisted his senior advocate (medically incapacitated) by appearing in court with an exemption application, though his signature was missing from the vakalatnama. The court issued notice returnable on 27.07.2026 and granted ad-interim relief pending full hearing, finding the complaint potentially constituted an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.MA/13545/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Gujarat granted ad-interim relief to petitioner Mahesh Boduram Yadav, a 28-year-old enrolled advocate, in his petition challenging a complaint filed against him under BNS sections 242, 319, and the Advocate Act section 45. The petitioner had assisted his senior advocate (medically incapacitated) by appearing in court with an exemption application, though his signature was missing from the vakalatnama. The court issued notice returnable on 27.07.2026 and granted ad-interim relief pending full hearing, finding the complaint potentially constituted an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts