SANJIVKUMAR @SANJU S/O ASHWINIKUMAR SOMNATH vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/13500/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Status: 116-Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240433592026
Filing Number
CR.MA/25203/2026
Filing Date
12-Jun-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/13500/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - REGULAR BAIL - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJIVKUMAR @SANJU S/O ASHWINIKUMAR SOMNATH
Adv. MS CHANDNI O VYAS(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.ILYASBHAI RASULBHAI BHOHARIYA (MUSLIM)
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
116-Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar
-
17-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi,honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. SutharView PDF
Case Summary: In this regular bail application under the POCSO Rules, 2020, the High Court of Gujarat (Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar) adjourned the matter to 09.07.2026 for further hearing. The court directed the Investigating Officer to comply with POCSO Rules 4(13) and 4(15) by informing the original complainant/victim and filing a compliance report before the returnable date. No bail order was passed in this interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.MA/13500/2026
Case Summary: In this regular bail application under the POCSO Rules, 2020, the High Court of Gujarat (Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar) adjourned the matter to 09.07.2026 for further hearing. The court directed the Investigating Officer to comply with POCSO Rules 4(13) and 4(15) by informing the original complainant/victim and filing a compliance report before the returnable date. No bail order was passed in this interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts