DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER vs KIRANKUMAR MALABHAI DAMOR Advocate - MR. CHINMAY S. UPADHYAY( — CA/2501/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240429172026

Filing Number

CA/17969/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

CA/2501/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.justice N.s.sanjay Gowda , Honourable Mr.justice J. L. Odedra

Coram

Honourable Mr.justice N.s.sanjay Gowda , Honourable Mr.justice J. L. Odedra

Bench Type

DIVISION

Category

69-DB - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 ( 69 )

Sub-Category

940-DB - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 - CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 940 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

    Adv. MR. NISARG N JAIN(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRANKUMAR MALABHAI DAMOR Advocate - MR. CHINMAY S. UPADHYAY(

  2. 2.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Umesh A. Trivedi,honourable Mr.justice J. L. OdedraView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court granted the District Development Officer's application to condone a delay of 323 days in filing a Letters Patent Appeal, finding the explanation provided satisfactory. The court allowed the application, permitting the appeal to proceed despite the substantial filing delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable Mr.justice N.s.sanjay Gowda , Honourable Mr.justice J. L. Odedra

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/2501/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court granted the District Development Officer's application to condone a delay of 323 days in filing a Letters Patent Appeal, finding the explanation provided satisfactory. The court allowed the application, permitting the appeal to proceed despite the substantial filing delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case