NILESHBHAI DINESHBHAI SOLANKI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/12896/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

CNR: GJHC240413152026

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

Filing Number

CR.MA/24077/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/12896/2026

Registration Date

09-06-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - REGULAR BAIL - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(M)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences(pocso) Act, 2012 Section 4,5(J)(2),5(L),6,8

Petitioner(s)

NILESHBHAI DINESHBHAI SOLANKI

Adv. SEHBAZHUSAN A KADRI(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

AMBALAL SOMABHAI ZALA

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

11-06-2026

641 - FRESH BAIL MATTERS (POCSO)

03-07-2026

639 - NOTICE RETURNABLE BAIL MATTERS (POCSO)

Orders

11-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

In this bail application under the POCSO Rules, 2020, the High Court of Gujarat issued notice returnable on 03.07.2026 and directed the Investigating Officer to comply with Rules 4(13) and 4(15) of the POCSO Rules by informing the original complainant/victim and filing a report before the returnable date. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In this bail application under the POCSO Rules, 2020, the High Court of Gujarat issued notice returnable on 03.07.2026 and directed the Investigating Officer to comply with Rules 4(13) and 4(15) of the POCSO Rules by informing the original complainant/victim and filing a report before the returnable date. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case