DR. JITENDRA KANJIBHAI VAGHELA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7876/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 08th September 2026.
CNR: GJHC240411332026
Filing Number
SCR.A/23971/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/7876/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. JITENDRA KANJIBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. KSHITIJ M AMIN(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.SUB- DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY (PCPNDT) THRO DR. GUNVANT ISAWADIYA
Case History
-
08-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Sep-2026
125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
11-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF
Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application for quashing (SCR.A/7876/2026), Dr. Jitendra Kanjibhai Vaghela challenged the trial court's premature framing of charges without prosecution evidence. The High Court of Gujarat found merit in the contention that under Section 267 BNSS, evidence collection is mandatory before framing charges in warrant-triable offences. The court issued notice returnable on 08.09.2026 and granted ad-interim relief pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCR.A/7876/2026
Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application for quashing (SCR.A/7876/2026), Dr. Jitendra Kanjibhai Vaghela challenged the trial court's premature framing of charges without prosecution evidence. The High Court of Gujarat found merit in the contention that under Section 267 BNSS, evidence collection is mandatory before framing charges in warrant-triable offences. The court issued notice returnable on 08.09.2026 and granted ad-interim relief pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts