ABHABHAI RUPSIBHAI RAJPUT(GOHIL) vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/12951/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH on 11th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240409982026
Filing Number
CR.MA/23887/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/12951/2026
Registration Date
09-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - REGULAR BAIL - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABHABHAI RUPSIBHAI RAJPUT(GOHIL)
Adv. MR NIRAV K PADHIYAR(
, ,ALPESHSINH B RAJPUT(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
3600-FRESH MATTERS
Revoked
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 11-06-2026 | Revoked |
Orders
Case Summary: CR.MA/12951/2026 The Gujarat High Court granted regular bail to Abhabhai Rupsibhai Rajput, accused of Prohibition Act violations, finding that investigation was substantially complete, nothing remained to be recovered, and prolonged pre-trial detention amounted to pre-trial conviction. The court applied the principle that "bail is a rule and jail is exception," emphasizing personal liberty rights under Article 21. Bail was set at Rs. 25,000 with a surety, subject to conditions including weekly police station reporting, passport surrender, state residency restrictions, and a six-month ban from entering Vav-Tharad district except for court/police appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CR.MA/12951/2026 The Gujarat High Court granted regular bail to Abhabhai Rupsibhai Rajput, accused of Prohibition Act violations, finding that investigation was substantially complete, nothing remained to be recovered, and prolonged pre-trial detention amounted to pre-trial conviction. The court applied the principle that "bail is a rule and jail is exception," emphasizing personal liberty rights under Article 21. Bail was set at Rs. 25,000 with a surety, subject to conditions including weekly police station reporting, passport surrender, state residency restrictions, and a six-month ban from entering Vav-Tharad district except for court/police appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts