RAHIMBHAI RAJAKBHAI MUSALMAN @SHEIKH vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7920/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 529-For Admission. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240409132026
Filing Number
SCR.A/23842/2026
Filing Date
05-Jun-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/7920/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHIMBHAI RAJAKBHAI MUSALMAN @SHEIKH
Adv. MR. RAHUL R DHOLAKIA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.LALITABEN KANJIBHAI SOSA
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
529-For Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
11-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF
Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application (Quashing) before the Gujarat High Court, applicant Rahimbhai Rajakbhai Musalman sought to quash proceedings against him. On 11/06/2026, the court adjourned the matter to 25/06/2026 at the request of advocates representing the original complainant, who sought additional time. The registry was directed to accept the vakalatnama (power of attorney) of the complainant's newly engaged counsels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCR.A/7920/2026
Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application (Quashing) before the Gujarat High Court, applicant Rahimbhai Rajakbhai Musalman sought to quash proceedings against him. On 11/06/2026, the court adjourned the matter to 25/06/2026 at the request of advocates representing the original complainant, who sought additional time. The registry was directed to accept the vakalatnama (power of attorney) of the complainant's newly engaged counsels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts