RAHIMBHAI RAJAKBHAI MUSALMAN @SHEIKH vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7920/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

CNR: GJHC240409132026

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

Filing Number

SCR.A/23842/2026

Filing Date

05-06-2026

Registration No

SCR.A/7920/2026

Registration Date

09-06-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )

Sub-Category

1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(M), 115(2)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(2)(5), 3(1)(R)(S), 3(1)(W)(I)

Petitioner(s)

RAHIMBHAI RAJAKBHAI MUSALMAN @SHEIKH

Adv. MR. RAHUL R DHOLAKIA(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

LALITABEN KANJIBHAI SOSA

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

11-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

25-06-2026

529-FOR ADMISSION

Orders

11-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application (Quashing) before the Gujarat High Court, applicant Rahimbhai Rajakbhai Musalman sought to quash proceedings against him. On 11/06/2026, the court adjourned the matter to 25/06/2026 at the request of advocates representing the original complainant, who sought additional time. The registry was directed to accept the vakalatnama (power of attorney) of the complainant's newly engaged counsels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application (Quashing) before the Gujarat High Court, applicant Rahimbhai Rajakbhai Musalman sought to quash proceedings against him. On 11/06/2026, the court adjourned the matter to 25/06/2026 at the request of advocates representing the original complainant, who sought additional time. The registry was directed to accept the vakalatnama (power of attorney) of the complainant's newly engaged counsels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita scheduled-castes-and-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-act-1989 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case