VIJAYSINH HAMIRSINH CHAUHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/12840/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Status: 194-For Final Hearing. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

194-For Final Hearing Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: GJHC240407852026

Filing Number

CR.MA/23748/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/12840/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto

Coram

Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

5 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYSINH HAMIRSINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. MR.DIPEN F CHAUDHARI(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

  2. 2.HIRABHAI LAXMANBHAI MAHIVAL

    Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (R)(

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    194-For Final Hearing

    Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice S.h.vora,honourable Ms. Justice S.V. PintoView PDF

    The High Court of Gujarat admitted the Criminal Miscellaneous Application for condonation of delay filed by Vijaysinh Hamirsinh Chauhan and issued a rule returnable on 22.06.2026. The learned APP waived service of the rule for the State of Gujarat, and direct service was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.MA/12840/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Gujarat admitted the Criminal Miscellaneous Application for condonation of delay filed by Vijaysinh Hamirsinh Chauhan and issued a rule returnable on 22.06.2026. The learned APP waived service of the rule for the State of Gujarat, and direct service was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case