ASHOKKUMAR S/O AYAPPAN MUTHURELA TEVAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA/1652/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442,250. Next hearing: 26th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240407102026
Next Hearing
26th June 2026
Filing Number
CR.RA/23713/2026
Filing Date
04-06-2026
Registration No
CR.RA/1652/2026
Registration Date
05-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO
Coram
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
903 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 903 )
Sub-Category
9 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - AGAINST INTERLOCATORY ORDER PASSED BY TRIAL COURT ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOKKUMAR S/O AYAPPAN MUTHURELA TEVAR
Adv. MR BN LIMBACHIA(
,NISHITH K JOSHI(
,NISHITH K JOSHI(
, ,NISHITH K JOSHI(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO
3600-FRESH MATTERS
529-FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 26-06-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: CR.RA/1652/2026 The High Court of Gujarat admitted the applicant's request to file additional documents on record. The trial court had scheduled charge framing for 12.06.2026, and the court permitted the applicant to seek adjournment before the trial court, which shall consider it on the adjourned date. The matter was listed for 23.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CR.RA/1652/2026 The High Court of Gujarat admitted the applicant's request to file additional documents on record. The trial court had scheduled charge framing for 12.06.2026, and the court permitted the applicant to seek adjournment before the trial court, which shall consider it on the adjourned date. The matter was listed for 23.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts