JAINILKUMAR SHAILESHBHAI PRAJAPATI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/12751/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Status: 529-For Admission. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

529-For Admission Next hearing 01-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CNR: GJHC240406452026

Filing Number

CR.MA/23672/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/12751/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker

Coram

Honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5),318(4),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAINILKUMAR SHAILESHBHAI PRAJAPATI

    Adv. MR. SUBHAM T. WAGHMARE(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen,honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thakerView PDF

    In this anticipatory bail application, the High Court of Gujarat adjourned the case to 01.07.2026 without deciding on the bail plea. The court permitted advocates representing the original complainant and two victims to file vakalatnama (power of attorney) documents in the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.MA/12751/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In this anticipatory bail application, the High Court of Gujarat adjourned the case to 01.07.2026 without deciding on the bail plea. The court permitted advocates representing the original complainant and two victims to file vakalatnama (power of attorney) documents in the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case