RAJENDRABHAI JAGAJI MALI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA/1641/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240406372026
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
CR.RA/23669/2026
Filing Date
04-06-2026
Registration No
CR.RA/1641/2026
Registration Date
04-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
8454 - SJ – CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION – BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA ( 8454 )
Sub-Category
1-SJ – CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION – BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA – AGAINST CONVICTION – NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRABHAI JAGAJI MALI
Adv. MR. MAULIK M SONI(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
RAMESHBHAI ARJANBHAI THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
3600-FRESH MATTERS
116-ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 06-07-2026 | 116-ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: In this Criminal Revision Application against a Negotiable Instrument Act conviction, the High Court of Gujarat granted conditional relief to applicant Rajendrabhai Jagaji Mali. The court ordered the applicant to deposit 30% of the cheque amount within one month before the trial court, and granted protection from coercive action until the next hearing on 06.07.2026. Non-compliance with the deposit condition will result in automatic vacation of the protection granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this Criminal Revision Application against a Negotiable Instrument Act conviction, the High Court of Gujarat granted conditional relief to applicant Rajendrabhai Jagaji Mali. The court ordered the applicant to deposit 30% of the cheque amount within one month before the trial court, and granted protection from coercive action until the next hearing on 06.07.2026. Non-compliance with the deposit condition will result in automatic vacation of the protection granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts