PATEL SHARDABEN WD/O SHANKARLAL MAGANLAL vs SOLANKI MOHANBHAI MOTIBHAI Advocate - null( — FA/2332/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act-1988 Section 173. Next hearing: 28th September 2026.

CNR: GJHC240404872026

Next Hearing

28th September 2026

Filing Number

FA/16921/2026

Filing Date

03-06-2026

Registration No

FA/2332/2026

Registration Date

05-06-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

Coram

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

285-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 ( 285 )

Sub-Category

2082-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 - COMPENSATION - UNDER SECTION - 166 - FATAL ( 2082 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act-1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

PATEL SHARDABEN WD/O SHANKARLAL MAGANLAL

Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(

BHARATKUMAR SHANKARLAL PATEL

Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(

NIMESHKUMAR SHANKARLAL PATEL

Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(

Respondent(s)

SOLANKI MOHANBHAI MOTIBHAI Advocate - null(

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

11-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

28-09-2026

182-FOR FINAL HEARING

Orders

11-06-2026
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

Case Summary: FA/2332/2026 In this First Appeal before the Gujarat High Court, Justice Mool Chand Tyagi issued a Rule on the appellants (Patel Shardaben and others) against respondents Solanki Mohanbhai Motibhai and The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. The case was adjourned with a Rule returnable on 28.09.2026, requiring the respondents to file their response by that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA/2332/2026 In this First Appeal before the Gujarat High Court, Justice Mool Chand Tyagi issued a Rule on the appellants (Patel Shardaben and others) against respondents Solanki Mohanbhai Motibhai and The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. The case was adjourned with a Rule returnable on 28.09.2026, requiring the respondents to file their response by that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case