HARSUKH MOHANBHAI DABHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7684/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE on 05th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240404142026
e-Filing Number
01-06-2026
Filing Number
SCR.A/23516/2026
Filing Date
03-06-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/7684/2026
Registration Date
03-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
2321-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - SEEKING PAROLE - THROUGH JAIL ( 2321 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
--28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARSUKH MOHANBHAI DABHI
Adv. THROUGH JAIL(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
JAIL SUPERINTENDENT
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
The Gujarat High Court dismissed Harsukh Mohanbhai Dabhi's parole application. The court upheld the authority's rejection, finding no infirmity in their decision to deny parole based on concerns about breach of peace and risk of absconding. The court reaffirmed that parole is a discretionary privilege, not a right, governed by the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed Harsukh Mohanbhai Dabhi's parole application. The court upheld the authority's rejection, finding no infirmity in their decision to deny parole based on concerns about breach of peace and risk of absconding. The court reaffirmed that parole is a discretionary privilege, not a right, governed by the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts