SHIRISHBHAI ASHOKBHAI GARANGE vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/12670/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: GJHC240403452026

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

CR.MA/23468/2026

Filing Date

03-06-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/12670/2026

Registration Date

04-06-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

Coram

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,351(2),54
Money-lenders Act, 1946 Section 33,40

Petitioner(s)

SHIRISHBHAI ASHOKBHAI GARANGE

Adv. MR KISHAN N BRAHMBHATT(

,MR ANAND BRAHMBHATT(

,MR ANAND BRAHMBHATT(

, ,MR ANAND BRAHMBHATT(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

08-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

15-06-2026

529-FOR ADMISSION

Orders

08-06-2026
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

In this anticipatory bail application by Shirishbhai Ashokbhai Garange against the State of Gujarat, the High Court of Gujarat (Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker) adjourned the matter to 15.06.2026. The court permitted the original complainant's newly engaged advocate, Mr. Manish Pathak, to file his vakalatnama (power of attorney) with the Registry. No decision on the anticipatory bail plea was rendered in this interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In this anticipatory bail application by Shirishbhai Ashokbhai Garange against the State of Gujarat, the High Court of Gujarat (Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker) adjourned the matter to 15.06.2026. The court permitted the original complainant's newly engaged advocate, Mr. Manish Pathak, to file his vakalatnama (power of attorney) with the Registry. No decision on the anticipatory bail plea was rendered in this interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Money-lenders Act, 1946 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case