THAKOR ANAND ROHITJI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.A/1237/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: 195-For Final Hearing. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240402722026
Filing Number
CR.A/23429/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
CR.A/1237/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
Coram
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
8447 - SJ – APPEAL – AGAINST CONVICTION ( 8447 )
Sub-Category
2-SJ – APPEAL – AGAINST CONVICTION – IN SPECIAL ACTS ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THAKOR ANAND ROHITJI
Adv. MR BHAVESH B SARODE(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia,honourable Mr.justice P. M. RavalView PDF
Case Summary: CR.A/1237/2026 The High Court of Gujarat admitted Thakor Anand Rohitji's criminal appeal against his conviction in a POCSO case and suspended his sentence pending appeal hearing. The appellant, convicted under sections of the BNS and POCSO Act with sentences ranging from 2-3 years imprisonment, was granted bail on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 personal bond with surety, furnishing residence address, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia,honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
-
05-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.A/1237/2026
Case Summary: CR.A/1237/2026 The High Court of Gujarat admitted Thakor Anand Rohitji's criminal appeal against his conviction in a POCSO case and suspended his sentence pending appeal hearing. The appellant, convicted under sections of the BNS and POCSO Act with sentences ranging from 2-3 years imprisonment, was granted bail on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 personal bond with surety, furnishing residence address, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts