SHABBIR HUSAIN ASGARBHAI BUCHAD(NAME AS PER ORDER OF LD. SESSIONS COURT) vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/12734/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240401212026
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
CR.MA/23308/2026
Filing Date
02-06-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/12734/2026
Registration Date
05-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - REGULAR BAIL - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHABBIR HUSAIN ASGARBHAI BUCHAD(NAME AS PER ORDER OF LD. SESSIONS COURT)
Adv. MR LAXMANSINH M ZALA(
JILLANI ASGARBHAI BUCHAD (NAME AS PER ORDER OF LD. SESSIONS COURT)
Adv. MR LAXMANSINH M ZALA(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
3600-FRESH MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 29-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 10-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CR.MA/12734/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the case to 29.06.2026. The court accepted permission for the original complainant's advocate (Mr. Shadkhan Z. Pathan) to file his Vakalatnama (power of attorney) in the bail applications. No substantive order on bail was passed; this was a procedural hearing consolidating three related bail applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CR.MA/12734/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the case to 29.06.2026. The court accepted permission for the original complainant's advocate (Mr. Shadkhan Z. Pathan) to file his Vakalatnama (power of attorney) in the bail applications. No substantive order on bail was passed; this was a procedural hearing consolidating three related bail applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts