RAJNIKANT DAHYABHAI PATEL vs RAJNIKANT BHAILALBHAI PATEL Advocate - null( — SA/334/2026
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 100. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240401142026
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
SA/16811/2026
Filing Date
02-06-2026
Registration No
SA/334/2026
Registration Date
04-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
507-SJ - SECOND APPEAL - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 ( 507 )
Sub-Category
1543-SJ - SECOND APPEAL - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 - MISCELLANEOUS ( 1543 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJNIKANT DAHYABHAI PATEL
Adv. MR. J. Z. SHAIKH(
Respondent(s)
RAJNIKANT BHAILALBHAI PATEL Advocate - null(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
3600-FRESH MATTERS
192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 22-06-2026 | 192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS |
| 22-06-2026 | 192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: SA/334/2026 Rajnikant Dahyabhai Patel v. Rajnikant Bhailalbhai Patel The High Court of Gujarat admitted this Second Appeal on 05/06/2026. The appellant (original plaintiff) challenged the First Appellate Court's decision that reversed the trial court's 2022 decree for specific performance of a 2010 property agreement worth Rs. 10,00,000. Four substantial questions of law were framed, questioning whether the appellate court erred in: treating the payment as token earnest money, drawing adverse inferences despite admitted signatures, requiring a separate possession prayer, and doubting enforceability based on alleged inadequate consideration. Notice of admission was set for 22/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Case Summary: SA/334/2026 Rajnikant Dahyabhai Patel v. Rajnikant Bhailalbhai Patel The High Court of Gujarat admitted this Second Appeal on 05/06/2026. The appellant (original plaintiff) challenged the First Appellate Court's decision that reversed the trial court's 2022 decree for specific performance of a 2010 property agreement worth Rs. 10,00,000. Four substantial questions of law were framed, questioning whether the appellate court erred in: treating the payment as token earnest money, drawing adverse inferences despite admitted signatures, requiring a separate possession prayer, and doubting enforceability based on alleged inadequate consideration. Notice of admission was set for 22/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts