VISHAL BHAI RAJU BHAI PATANI (DANTIMAR) vs DIVYA BEN W/O VISHAL BHAI PATANI D/O ARVIND BHAI Advocate - null( — CA/2439/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE on 11th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240400652026
Filing Number
CA/16798/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
CA/2439/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
69-DB - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 ( 69 )
Sub-Category
940-DB - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 - CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 940 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHAL BHAI RAJU BHAI PATANI (DANTIMAR)
Adv. MR RAJESH M CHAUHAN(
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIVYA BEN W/O VISHAL BHAI PATANI D/O ARVIND BHAI Advocate - null(
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice R.m.chhaya,honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. VoraView PDF
The High Court of Gujarat condoned the delay in preferring a civil application by Vishal Bhai Raju Bhai Patani against Divya Ben (his wife), finding that sufficient cause had been established. The court allowed the condonation application, enabling the applicant to proceed with his pending First Appeal No. 16797/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/2439/2026
The High Court of Gujarat condoned the delay in preferring a civil application by Vishal Bhai Raju Bhai Patani against Divya Ben (his wife), finding that sufficient cause had been established. The court allowed the condonation application, enabling the applicant to proceed with his pending First Appeal No. 16797/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts