M/S. BFXX ENTERPRISE LLP THRO NIRAV SANJAY BHATT vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7677/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240400242026
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
SCR.A/23231/2026
Filing Date
01-06-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/7677/2026
Registration Date
03-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
2317-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - SEEKING DIRECTIONS - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 2317 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. BFXX ENTERPRISE LLP THRO NIRAV SANJAY BHATT
Adv. HARSHIT R PUROHIT(
,MR NITIN PUROHIT(
,MR NITIN PUROHIT(
, ,MR NITIN PUROHIT(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
3600-FRESH MATTERS
125-NOTICE RETURNABLE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 10-06-2026 | 125-NOTICE RETURNABLE & ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: SCR.A/7677/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice on the Special Criminal Application filed by M/S. BFXX Enterprise LLP (through Nirav Sanjay Bhatt) against the State of Gujarat and State Bank of India. The matter was adjourned to 10.06.2026 for further hearing; the APP waived service of notice on behalf of the State, and the petitioner was permitted to directly serve Respondent No. 2 (SBI). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SCR.A/7677/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice on the Special Criminal Application filed by M/S. BFXX Enterprise LLP (through Nirav Sanjay Bhatt) against the State of Gujarat and State Bank of India. The matter was adjourned to 10.06.2026 for further hearing; the APP waived service of notice on behalf of the State, and the petitioner was permitted to directly serve Respondent No. 2 (SBI). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts