BHUMIL YOGESHKUMAR SHAH MARUTI TRADING COMPANY vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA/1645/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 442,438. Next hearing: 17th September 2026.

CNR: GJHC240399752026

Next Hearing

17th September 2026

Filing Number

CR.RA/23186/2026

Filing Date

01-06-2026

Registration No

CR.RA/1645/2026

Registration Date

05-06-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO

Coram

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

903 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 903 )

Sub-Category

9 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - AGAINST INTERLOCATORY ORDER PASSED BY TRIAL COURT ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 442,438
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

BHUMIL YOGESHKUMAR SHAH MARUTI TRADING COMPANY

Adv. MR HIMANSHU C DESAI(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

VYAPTI BUILDER THRO ITS MANAGER BHAVIN MANIKANT BADAMI

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO

11-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

17-09-2026

125-NOTICE RETURNABLE & ADJOURNED MATTERS

Orders

11-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO

In Criminal Revision Application No. 1645/2026 before the High Court of Gujarat, Bhumil Yogeshkumar Shah Maruti Trading Company challenged a subordinate court order. The court issued notice returnable on 17.09.2026, with the learned APP waiving service of notice for the State. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Revision Application No. 1645/2026 before the High Court of Gujarat, Bhumil Yogeshkumar Shah Maruti Trading Company challenged a subordinate court order. The court issued notice returnable on 17.09.2026, with the learned APP waiving service of notice for the State. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case