BHUMIL YOGESHKUMAR SHAH MARUTI TRADING COMPANY vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA/1645/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 442,438. Status: 125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 17th September 2026.
CNR: GJHC240399752026
Filing Number
CR.RA/23186/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
CR.RA/1645/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto
Coram
Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
903 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 903 )
Sub-Category
9 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - AGAINST INTERLOCATORY ORDER PASSED BY TRIAL COURT ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHUMIL YOGESHKUMAR SHAH MARUTI TRADING COMPANY
Adv. MR HIMANSHU C DESAI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.VYAPTI BUILDER THRO ITS MANAGER BHAVIN MANIKANT BADAMI
Case History
-
17-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Sep-2026
125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto
-
11-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice S.h.vora,honourable Ms. Justice S.V. PintoView PDF
In Criminal Revision Application No. 1645/2026 before the High Court of Gujarat, Bhumil Yogeshkumar Shah Maruti Trading Company challenged a subordinate court order. The court issued notice returnable on 17.09.2026, with the learned APP waiving service of notice for the State. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.RA/1645/2026
In Criminal Revision Application No. 1645/2026 before the High Court of Gujarat, Bhumil Yogeshkumar Shah Maruti Trading Company challenged a subordinate court order. The court issued notice returnable on 17.09.2026, with the learned APP waiving service of notice for the State. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts