RIDDHI VISHAL PANCHMATIYA vs VISHAL MADHAVDAS PANCHMATIYA Advocate - null( — SCA/7779/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 3600-Fresh Matters. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240399152026
Filing Number
SCA/16758/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
SCA/7779/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.justice L. S. Pirzada
Coram
Honourable Mr.justice L. S. Pirzada
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
505-SJ - NON-SERVICE - LOWER COURT - MATTERS PERTAINING TO GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT ( 505 )
Sub-Category
1489-SJ - NON-SERVICE - LOWER COURT - MATTERS PERTAINING TO GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT -CHALLENGING THE INTERLOCUTOAR ORDERS ( 1489 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RIDDHI VISHAL PANCHMATIYA
Adv. MR FENIL H BATHIYA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHAL MADHAVDAS PANCHMATIYA Advocate - null(
-
2.NAYANKUMAR HARSHADBHAI TRIVEDI
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr.justice L. S. Pirzada
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Biren Vaishnav,honourable Mr.justice L. S. PirzadaView PDF
Case Summary (SCA/7779/2026): The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the matter to 15.06.2026 to allow respondent Vishal Madhavdas Panchmatiya to engage an advocate and file an affidavit-in-reply. The petitioner's deadline to deposit Rs.20,000/- as cost was extended until 15.06.2026, subject to the petition's outcome. The petitioner's advocate was permitted to file the paper book before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7779/2026
Case Summary (SCA/7779/2026): The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the matter to 15.06.2026 to allow respondent Vishal Madhavdas Panchmatiya to engage an advocate and file an affidavit-in-reply. The petitioner's deadline to deposit Rs.20,000/- as cost was extended until 15.06.2026, subject to the petition's outcome. The petitioner's advocate was permitted to file the paper book before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts