TALHA YUNUS SARESHWALA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA/1614/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442,528. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: GJHC240399132026

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

CR.RA/23155/2026

Filing Date

01-06-2026

Registration No

CR.RA/1614/2026

Registration Date

01-06-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Coram

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

8454 - SJ – CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION – BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA ( 8454 )

Sub-Category

1-SJ – CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION – BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA – AGAINST CONVICTION – NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442,528
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

TALHA YUNUS SARESHWALA

Adv. PRITHU PARIMAL(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

MUKESH RASIKLAL SHETH

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

02-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

11-06-2026

116-ADJOURNED MATTERS

03-06-2026

116-ADJOURNED MATTERS

Orders

02-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Case Summary: In Criminal Revision Application CR.RA/1614/2026 before the Gujarat High Court, Talha Yunus Sareshwala challenged a conviction under the Negotiable Instrument Act. On 02/06/2026, Justice P. M. Raval adjourned the matter to 03/06/2026 at the request of the applicant's counsel. The court directed the original complainant's newly engaged advocates to file their Vakalatnama before the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Criminal Revision Application CR.RA/1614/2026 before the Gujarat High Court, Talha Yunus Sareshwala challenged a conviction under the Negotiable Instrument Act. On 02/06/2026, Justice P. M. Raval adjourned the matter to 03/06/2026 at the request of the applicant's counsel. The court directed the original complainant's newly engaged advocates to file their Vakalatnama before the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case