ASHOKKUMAR VIJAYSINH BAROT vs ADM AND SONS INFRA PVT LTD Advocate - null( — CRA/317/2026
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 115. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240398742026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
CRA/16742/2026
Filing Date
01-06-2026
Registration No
CRA/317/2026
Registration Date
04-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
272-SJ - CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 ( 272 )
Sub-Category
1226-SJ - CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 - REJECTION OF THE PLAINT UNDER - ORDER - 7 RULE 11 ( 1226 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOKKUMAR VIJAYSINH BAROT
Adv. MR. JAY M THAKKAR(
,MR. PR BRAHMBHATT(
,MR. PR BRAHMBHATT(
, ,MR. PR BRAHMBHATT(
Respondent(s)
ADM AND SONS INFRA PVT LTD Advocate - null(
RAMKISHOR BHANWARLAL SUTHAR
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
3600-FRESH MATTERS
192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 16-06-2026 | 192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CRA/317/2026 Outcome: Civil Revision Application allowed in part; notice issued to respondents returnable 16.06.2026; further proceedings in Special Civil Suit No.59 of 2025 stayed pending hearing. Key Issue: The trial court rejected defendant Barot's Order VII Rule 11 application (challenging suit's maintainability) after granting the plaintiff an adjournment to file a reply, then proceeded ex-parte to decide the application and simultaneously approved court commissioner appointment on 08.05.2026. Finding: Justice Pirzada found procedural irregularity—the court granted adjournment but then passed orders on the same day without giving the defendant opportunity to present arguments, warranting reconsideration of the revision application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRA/317/2026 Outcome: Civil Revision Application allowed in part; notice issued to respondents returnable 16.06.2026; further proceedings in Special Civil Suit No.59 of 2025 stayed pending hearing. Key Issue: The trial court rejected defendant Barot's Order VII Rule 11 application (challenging suit's maintainability) after granting the plaintiff an adjournment to file a reply, then proceeded ex-parte to decide the application and simultaneously approved court commissioner appointment on 08.05.2026. Finding: Justice Pirzada found procedural irregularity—the court granted adjournment but then passed orders on the same day without giving the defendant opportunity to present arguments, warranting reconsideration of the revision application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts