RAMDEVSINH LAKHUBHAI VANAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/7811/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 192-Notice & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240398702026
Filing Number
SCA/16740/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
SCA/7811/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
464-SJ - NON-SERVICE - INDIAN TELEGRAPH ACT, 1885 ( 464 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMDEVSINH LAKHUBHAI VANAR
Adv. MR DARSHAN K KOTHARI(
-
2.GOVINDSANG HARISANG VANAR
Adv. MR DARSHAN K KOTHARI(
-
3.SAVITABEN HARISANG VANAR
Adv. MR DARSHAN K KOTHARI(
-
4.PRAVIN SINGH HARISANG VANAR
Adv. MR DARSHAN K KOTHARI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE , AHMEDABAD
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
3.GUJARAT STATE ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED
Adv. MR SP HASURKAR(
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board
Honourable Mr.justice L. S. Pirzada
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Biren Vaishnav,honourable Mr.justice L. S. PirzadaView PDF
Case Summary: SCA/7811/2026 The High Court of Gujarat issued notice to the respondents (State of Gujarat, District Collector Ahmedabad, and Gujarat State Energy Transmission Corporation Limited) returnable on 08.06.2026. The court accepted an affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No.3 and permitted direct service on respondent No.2. The case was listed for priority hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7811/2026
Case Summary: SCA/7811/2026 The High Court of Gujarat issued notice to the respondents (State of Gujarat, District Collector Ahmedabad, and Gujarat State Energy Transmission Corporation Limited) returnable on 08.06.2026. The court accepted an affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No.3 and permitted direct service on respondent No.2. The case was listed for priority hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts