ANAND YOGESHKUMAR PATHAK vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA/1640/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 442. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240397302026
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
CR.RA/23035/2026
Filing Date
29-05-2026
Registration No
CR.RA/1640/2026
Registration Date
04-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
8454 - SJ – CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION – BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA ( 8454 )
Sub-Category
1-SJ – CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION – BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA – AGAINST CONVICTION – NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANAND YOGESHKUMAR PATHAK
Adv. MS PALAK G JADEJA(
,MR K K BHATT(
,MR K K BHATT(
, ,MR K K BHATT(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
NARESH SHIVAJI PATIL
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
3600-FRESH MATTERS
407-Rule Returnable
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 13-07-2026 | 407-Rule Returnable |
Orders
Case Summary: CR.RA/1640/2026 Outcome: Anand Yogeshkumar Pathak's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld by lower courts. The High Court issued a Rule, suspended his sentence pending revision hearing (returnable 13.07.2026), and granted bail on condition he deposits 10% of cheque amount within 2 weeks and 20% within 4 weeks with the trial court, plus personal bond of Rs.10,000 with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CR.RA/1640/2026 Outcome: Anand Yogeshkumar Pathak's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld by lower courts. The High Court issued a Rule, suspended his sentence pending revision hearing (returnable 13.07.2026), and granted bail on condition he deposits 10% of cheque amount within 2 weeks and 20% within 4 weeks with the trial court, plus personal bond of Rs.10,000 with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts