ARSHADHUSEN @RAJA @JAVED @AMITKUMAR S/O MOHAMMAD MAKI ANSARI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/12316/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Status: 3600-Fresh Matters. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240394542026
Filing Number
CR.MA/22832/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/12316/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - REGULAR BAIL - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARSHADHUSEN @RAJA @JAVED @AMITKUMAR S/O MOHAMMAD MAKI ANSARI
Adv. SUDHANSHU A JHA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar
-
11-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi,honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. SutharView PDF
Case Summary: In CR.MA/12316/2026, petitioner Arshadhusen (alias Raja, Javed, Amitkumar) filed a regular bail application with the Gujarat High Court after chargesheet. On 11/06/2026, Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar adjourned the matter to 24/06/2026 at the request of the applicant's counsel, without ruling on the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora
-
02-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.MA/12316/2026
Case Summary: In CR.MA/12316/2026, petitioner Arshadhusen (alias Raja, Javed, Amitkumar) filed a regular bail application with the Gujarat High Court after chargesheet. On 11/06/2026, Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar adjourned the matter to 24/06/2026 at the request of the applicant's counsel, without ruling on the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts