VED ASSOCIATES PROPREITOR - DHARMESH S FATEKAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/12358/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Status: 194-For Final Hearing. Next hearing: 11th August 2026.
CNR: GJHC240391982026
Filing Number
CR.MA/22645/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/12358/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto
Coram
Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
5 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VED ASSOCIATES PROPREITOR - DHARMESH S FATEKAR
Adv. TAHIR S SAIYED(
-
2.,MR. AMAN D RANA(
-
3.,MR. AMAN D RANA(
-
4., ,MR. AMAN D RANA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.MAULIK MANUBHAI PATEL
Case History
-
11-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Aug-2026
194-For Final Hearing
Honourable Ms. Justice S.V. Pinto
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice S.h.vora,honourable Ms. Justice S.V. PintoView PDF
Summary: In this Criminal Misc. Application for condonation of delay filed by Ved Associates proprietor Dharmesh S Fatekar against the State of Gujarat, the High Court of Gujarat (Justice S.V. Pinto) issued an oral order on 08/06/2026 making the rule returnable on 11/08/2026. The state's counsel waived service of notice, and the matter was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.MA/12358/2026
Summary: In this Criminal Misc. Application for condonation of delay filed by Ved Associates proprietor Dharmesh S Fatekar against the State of Gujarat, the High Court of Gujarat (Justice S.V. Pinto) issued an oral order on 08/06/2026 making the rule returnable on 11/08/2026. The state's counsel waived service of notice, and the matter was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts