JAYANTIBHAI LALLUBHAI SHARMA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA/1601/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 442,238. Status: 195-For Final Hearing. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240384632026
Filing Number
CR.RA/22208/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
CR.RA/1601/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
Coram
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
903 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 903 )
Sub-Category
1 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - AGAINST ORDER OF CONVICTION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAYANTIBHAI LALLUBHAI SHARMA
Adv. MR ANVESH V VYAS(
-
2.,MR DHAVALKUMAR L DESAI(
-
3.,MR DHAVALKUMAR L DESAI(
-
4., ,MR DHAVALKUMAR L DESAI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.PARESHKUMAR MANJIBHAI KAHNT
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia,honourable Mr.justice P. M. RavalView PDF
Case Summary: CR.RA/1601/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Gujarat suspended the applicant's 3-year imprisonment sentence and granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of equal amount. The court found a prima facie case in the applicant's favor regarding non-appreciation of evidence and issued a Rule for final hearing of the revision application challenging the conviction under IPC Sections 415, 417, 465, 468, and 471. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.RA/1601/2026
Case Summary: CR.RA/1601/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Gujarat suspended the applicant's 3-year imprisonment sentence and granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of equal amount. The court found a prima facie case in the applicant's favor regarding non-appreciation of evidence and issued a Rule for final hearing of the revision application challenging the conviction under IPC Sections 415, 417, 465, 468, and 471. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts