MRUGANDA W/O KRUTESH SHAH vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7360/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 529-For Admission. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

529-For Admission Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: GJHC240383572026

Filing Number

SCR.A/22119/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

SCR.A/7360/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )

Sub-Category

1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),61(2)
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRUGANDA W/O KRUTESH SHAH

    Adv. MR SANJAY PRAJAPATI(

  2. 2.,MR SM DERASARI(

  3. 3.,MR SM DERASARI(

  4. 4., ,MR SM DERASARI(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

  2. 2.DINESH NAVALKISHOR SONI

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF

    The case was adjourned to 25.06.2026 at the request of the Original Complainant's newly appeared advocate. The court accepted the advocate's power of attorney and directed the petitioner to file chargesheet papers on record in the interim. No substantive order on the quashing petition was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCR.A/7360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case was adjourned to 25.06.2026 at the request of the Original Complainant's newly appeared advocate. The court accepted the advocate's power of attorney and directed the petitioner to file chargesheet papers on record in the interim. No substantive order on the quashing petition was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case