STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH RANGE FOREST OFFICER vs SINGABHAI VANDARIYABHAI VASAVA Advocate - null( — SCA/7578/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 192-Notice & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

192-Notice & Adjourned Matters Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CNR: GJHC240379162026

Filing Number

SCA/16124/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

SCA/7578/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

321-SJ - LABOUR - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947 ( 321 )

Sub-Category

1290-SJ - LABOUR - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947 - AGAINST AWARD ( 1290 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH RANGE FOREST OFFICER

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SINGABHAI VANDARIYABHAI VASAVA Advocate - null(

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jul-2026

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF

    The High Court of Gujarat admitted the special civil application filed by the State of Gujarat challenging a gratuity recovery order against employee Singabhai Vandariyabhai Vasava. The State contended that the employee had not completed 240 days of service and was therefore ineligible for benefits, and that the Commissioner failed to address this argument. The case was adjourned with notice returnable on 20.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCA/7578/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Gujarat admitted the special civil application filed by the State of Gujarat challenging a gratuity recovery order against employee Singabhai Vandariyabhai Vasava. The State contended that the employee had not completed 240 days of service and was therefore ineligible for benefits, and that the Commissioner failed to address this argument. The case was adjourned with notice returnable on 20.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case