SAJJAN KALIKANT ZHA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/11480/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

CNR: GJHC240368322026

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

CR.MA/21175/2026

Filing Date

08-05-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/11480/2026

Registration Date

08-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

Coram

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

2 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF COMPLAINT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(2), 143(3), 61(2)A
Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 Section 3,4,5

Petitioner(s)

SAJJAN KALIKANT ZHA

Adv. MR PARTH B THUMMAR(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

FEMALE HEAD CONSTABLE

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

08-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

17-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

10-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

Orders

10-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Case Summary: CR.MA/11480/2026 The Gujarat High Court heard Sajjan Kalikant Zha's petition seeking quashing/setting aside of an FIR. Justice P. M. Raval adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026, directing the Additional Public Prosecutor to obtain instructions regarding the applicant's role in the alleged offence. No substantive order on the merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR.MA/11480/2026 The Gujarat High Court heard Sajjan Kalikant Zha's petition seeking quashing/setting aside of an FIR. Justice P. M. Raval adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026, directing the Additional Public Prosecutor to obtain instructions regarding the applicant's role in the alleged offence. No substantive order on the merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case