BRAHMAN MAANJI LAKHIRAM vs DEPUTY COLLECTOR Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/7610/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240367802026
Filing Number
SCA/15623/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
SCA/7610/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
347-SJ - LAND LAWS - MAMLATDARS COURTS ACT, 1906 ( 347 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRAHMAN MAANJI LAKHIRAM
Adv. MR SP MAJMUDAR(
-
2.,MR. KUSH N. BAVISHI(
-
3.,MR. KUSH N. BAVISHI(
-
4., ,MR. KUSH N. BAVISHI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEPUTY COLLECTOR Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.MAMLATDAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
3.BRAHMAN SHANKARBHAI NARANBHAI
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
Case History
-
20-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Jul-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia,honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. JoshiView PDF
Case Summary: SCA/7610/2026 The High Court of Gujarat (Justice Divyesh A. Joshi) granted an interim order permitting petitioner Brahman Maanji Lakhiram's advocate to file an additional affidavit containing copies of witness depositions previously recorded before the Mamlatdar. The case was adjourned with notice returnable on 20th July 2026, and the Registry was directed to accept the additional affidavit filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7610/2026
Case Summary: SCA/7610/2026 The High Court of Gujarat (Justice Divyesh A. Joshi) granted an interim order permitting petitioner Brahman Maanji Lakhiram's advocate to file an additional affidavit containing copies of witness depositions previously recorded before the Mamlatdar. The case was adjourned with notice returnable on 20th July 2026, and the Registry was directed to accept the additional affidavit filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts