KARIMBHAI @PINTU SHERALIABHAI RASHIYANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7826/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14,21,226. Disposed: --56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240366932026

Filing Number

SCR.A/21120/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

SCR.A/7826/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker

Coram

Honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )

Sub-Category

2307-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - SEEKING FURLOUGH - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 2307 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14,21,226
Gujarat Police Act Section 135
Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARIMBHAI @PINTU SHERALIABHAI RASHIYANI

    Adv. MR ANIL H RATHOD(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

  2. 2.JAIL SUPERINTENDENT

  3. 3.I.G.PRISON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen,honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thakerView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court disposed of petitioner Karimbhai's furlough leave application by directing the concerned prison authority to decide the pending application within ten days and communicate the outcome to the petitioner. The court did not grant the furlough leave directly but instead expedited the decision-making process at the administrative level. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable Mr.justice Sanjeev J.thaker

  4. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCR.A/7826/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court disposed of petitioner Karimbhai's furlough leave application by directing the concerned prison authority to decide the pending application within ten days and communicate the outcome to the petitioner. The court did not grant the furlough leave directly but instead expedited the decision-making process at the administrative level. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case