NAYANABEN D/O BABULAL DAHYALAL PANDYA W/O BHAVESHKUMAR JASWANTLAL GOR vs BHAVESHKUMAR JASWANTLAL GOR Advocate - null( — FA/2237/2026

Case under Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19. Status: 182-For Final Hearing. Next hearing: : -.

182-For Final Hearing Next hearing —

CNR: GJHC240364342026

Filing Number

FA/15397/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

FA/2237/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani

Bench Type

DIVISION

Category

24-DB - FIRST APPEAL - FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984 ( 24 )

Sub-Category

854-DB - FIRST APPEAL - FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984 - MISCELLANEOUS ( 854 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAYANABEN D/O BABULAL DAHYALAL PANDYA W/O BHAVESHKUMAR JASWANTLAL GOR

    Adv. POOJA D BASWAL(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVESHKUMAR JASWANTLAL GOR Advocate - null(

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice R.m.chhaya,honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. VoraView PDF

    Case Summary: FA/2237/2026 The Gujarat High Court admitted the first appeal filed by Nayanaben (appellant) against Bhaveshkumar Jaswantlal Gor (respondent) on 08/06/2026. The court permitted the appellant's counsel to place necessary case records on record and directed the Registry to call for the complete record and proceedings from the lower court for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/2237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA/2237/2026 The Gujarat High Court admitted the first appeal filed by Nayanaben (appellant) against Bhaveshkumar Jaswantlal Gor (respondent) on 08/06/2026. The court permitted the appellant's counsel to place necessary case records on record and directed the Registry to call for the complete record and proceedings from the lower court for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case