MADHAV POWER PRIVATE LIMITED vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENT CIR 2( — SCA/7305/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240362152026
Filing Number
SCA/15303/2026
Filing Date
07-May-2026
Registration No
SCA/7305/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
46-DB - TAX MATTERS - INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ( 46 )
Sub-Category
1-DB - TAX MATTERS - INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS - DIRECT TAX ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHAV POWER PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. MR B S SOPARKAR(
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENT CIR 2(
-
2.AHMEDABAD Advocate - MR.VARUN K.PATEL(
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. SupehiaView PDF
Case Summary: The Gujarat High Court adjourned three consolidated special civil applications filed by Madhav Power Private Limited against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. Notice was directed to be returnable on 29.06.2026, with the matter placed at the top of the board for hearing. The respondent waived service of notice, and direct service was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7305/2026
Case Summary: The Gujarat High Court adjourned three consolidated special civil applications filed by Madhav Power Private Limited against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. Notice was directed to be returnable on 29.06.2026, with the matter placed at the top of the board for hearing. The respondent waived service of notice, and direct service was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts