ASHOK MADHAVDAS KHURANA vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENT CIR 2 ( — SCA/7392/2026

Case under Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 147. Status: 157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board Next hearing 29-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: GJHC240362142026

Filing Number

SCA/15302/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

SCA/7392/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

Bench Type

DIVISION

Category

46-DB - TAX MATTERS - INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ( 46 )

Sub-Category

1-DB - TAX MATTERS - INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS - DIRECT TAX ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 147

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK MADHAVDAS KHURANA

    Adv. MR B S SOPARKAR(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENT CIR 2 (

  2. 2.AHMEDABAD Advocate - MR.VARUN K.PATEL(

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. SupehiaView PDF

    The case (SCA/7392/2026) was adjourned with notice returnable on 29.06.2026. The respondent's Senior Standing Counsel waived service of notice, and direct service was permitted. The matter was placed at the top of the board for priority hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCA/7392/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case (SCA/7392/2026) was adjourned with notice returnable on 29.06.2026. The respondent's Senior Standing Counsel waived service of notice, and direct service was permitted. The matter was placed at the top of the board for priority hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case