JAGDISHBHAI DANABHAI VALODARA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/6888/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Status: 125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 03rd September 2026.
CNR: GJHC240361452026
Filing Number
SCR.A/20889/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/6888/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGDISHBHAI DANABHAI VALODARA
Adv. MR YASH J PATEL(
-
2.,MR. PARTHSHAKTI M PRAJAPATI(
-
3.,MR. PARTHSHAKTI M PRAJAPATI(
-
4., ,MR. PARTHSHAKTI M PRAJAPATI(
-
5.PARASBEN JAGDISHBHAI VALODARA
Adv. MR YASH J PATEL(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.DIPALIBEN HIRENBHAI VALODARA W/O HIRENBHAI JAGDISHBHAI VALODARA
Adv. NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(
Case History
-
03-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Sep-2026
125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF
Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application (Quashing) petition, the father-in-law and mother-in-law (petitioners) challenged an FIR alleging they failed to take action when the complainant reported ill-treatment by her husband. Finding no specific overt act attributed to the petitioners beyond inaction, the High Court of Gujarat issued notice returnable on 03.09.2026 and granted ad-interim relief under Para 6.2 pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCR.A/6888/2026
Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application (Quashing) petition, the father-in-law and mother-in-law (petitioners) challenged an FIR alleging they failed to take action when the complainant reported ill-treatment by her husband. Finding no specific overt act attributed to the petitioners beyond inaction, the High Court of Gujarat issued notice returnable on 03.09.2026 and granted ad-interim relief under Para 6.2 pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts