KISHORBHAI BHAVANBHAI MAKWANA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/7364/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 00. Status: 192-Notice & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240361012026
Filing Number
SCA/15228/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Registration No
SCA/7364/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
321-SJ - LABOUR - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947 ( 321 )
Sub-Category
1290-SJ - LABOUR - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947 - AGAINST AWARD ( 1290 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KISHORBHAI BHAVANBHAI MAKWANA
Adv. MR HANNAN A QURESHI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.GUJARAT STATE POLICE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD.
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jul-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF
Case Summary: SCA/7364/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The High Court of Gujarat issued notice to the respondents, making the matter returnable on 17.07.2026. Petitioner Kishorbhai Bhavanbhai Makwana challenged his termination as a peon (employed since 01.08.2018 at Rs. 9,500/month) without termination notice, citing lack of permanency grounds. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to file a paperbook before registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7364/2026
Case Summary: SCA/7364/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The High Court of Gujarat issued notice to the respondents, making the matter returnable on 17.07.2026. Petitioner Kishorbhai Bhavanbhai Makwana challenged his termination as a peon (employed since 01.08.2018 at Rs. 9,500/month) without termination notice, citing lack of permanency grounds. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to file a paperbook before registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts