ASHISHKUMAR PRAVEENBHAI PANCHAL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/6826/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

CNR: GJHC240358442026

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

SCR.A/20700/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

SCR.A/6826/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )

Sub-Category

1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),296(B),351(2)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(R),3(1)(S),3(2)(VA)

Petitioner(s)

ASHISHKUMAR PRAVEENBHAI PANCHAL

Adv. MR DIGANT B KAKKAD(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

MITIL @ DHARMESH BABUBHAI RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

08-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

17-06-2026

529-FOR ADMISSION

Orders

08-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application (Quashing) before the Gujarat High Court, the petition filed by Ashishkumar Praveenbhai Panchal against the State of Gujarat was adjourned. The original complainant's advocate, Mr. M.M. Soni, appeared and requested time to file his response. The court granted the adjournment to 17.06.2026 and directed the registry to accept Soni's vakalatnama (power of attorney) and place it on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this Special Criminal Application (Quashing) before the Gujarat High Court, the petition filed by Ashishkumar Praveenbhai Panchal against the State of Gujarat was adjourned. The original complainant's advocate, Mr. M.M. Soni, appeared and requested time to file his response. The court granted the adjournment to 17.06.2026 and directed the registry to accept Soni's vakalatnama (power of attorney) and place it on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita scheduled-castes-and-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-act-1989 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case