AMPLE CONSTRUCTION vs K.K. INFRASTRUCTURE Advocate - null( — SCR.A/6898/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.

CNR: GJHC240358362026

Next Hearing

04th August 2026

Filing Number

SCR.A/20696/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

SCR.A/6898/2026

Registration Date

07-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )

Sub-Category

1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

AMPLE CONSTRUCTION

Adv. MR BM MANGUKIYA(

,MS BELA A PRAJAPATI(

,MS BELA A PRAJAPATI(

, ,MS BELA A PRAJAPATI(

Respondent(s)

K.K. INFRASTRUCTURE Advocate - null(

STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

08-06-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

04-08-2026

125-NOTICE RETURNABLE & ADJOURNED MATTERS

Orders

08-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Case Summary: In Special Criminal Application (Quashing) No. 6898/2026, the Gujarat High Court issued notice in the petition filed by Ample Construction against K.K. Infrastructure and the State of Gujarat. The notice is returnable on 4.8.2026. The State waived service of notice, and the petitioner may request adjournment before the trial court pending the hearing. Direct service of notice is permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Special Criminal Application (Quashing) No. 6898/2026, the Gujarat High Court issued notice in the petition filed by Ample Construction against K.K. Infrastructure and the State of Gujarat. The notice is returnable on 4.8.2026. The State waived service of notice, and the petitioner may request adjournment before the trial court pending the hearing. Direct service of notice is permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case