M/S EXPANDED POLYMER SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - MR PRADIP D BHATE( — SCA/7230/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 192-Notice & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240356812026
Filing Number
SCA/15041/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
SCA/7230/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
41-DB - TAX MATTERS - CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 ( 41 )
Sub-Category
1-DB - TAX MATTERS - CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS - INDIRECT TAX ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S EXPANDED POLYMER SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
Adv. MR DHAVAL SHAH(
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - MR PRADIP D BHATE(
-
2.DIRECTORATE GENERAL TRADE REMEDIES
Adv. MR PRADIP D BHATE(
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. SupehiaView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the matter to 15.06.2026 with notice returnable. The court directed provisional assessment of imports for the product in issue and cautioned importers of potential Anti Dumping Duty (ADD) imposition if the respondent succeeds in the writ petition, while clarifying such direction creates no equities in respondent's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7230/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the matter to 15.06.2026 with notice returnable. The court directed provisional assessment of imports for the product in issue and cautioned importers of potential Anti Dumping Duty (ADD) imposition if the respondent succeeds in the writ petition, while clarifying such direction creates no equities in respondent's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts