GAURANG RAGHAVJIBHAI PATEL THROUGH POA HOLDER HIREN RAGHAVJIBHAI BHIKADIA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3( — SCA/8216/2026
Case under Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 00. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240352362026
Filing Number
SCA/14828/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
SCA/8216/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
46-DB - TAX MATTERS - INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ( 46 )
Sub-Category
1-DB - TAX MATTERS - INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS - DIRECT TAX ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAURANG RAGHAVJIBHAI PATEL THROUGH POA HOLDER HIREN RAGHAVJIBHAI BHIKADIA
Adv. MR MANISH J SHAH(
Respondent(s)
-
1.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(
-
2.(
-
3.Advocate - KARAN G SANGHANI(
-
4.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (JUDICIAL)
Adv. KARAN G SANGHANI(
Case History
-
21-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Jul-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
19-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. SupehiaView PDF
The Gujarat High Court issued notice to the Income Tax Officer Ward 3(2)(1) with the next hearing on 21.07.2026. The Court permitted the assessment to continue but imposed a crucial restriction: no final order can be passed without the Court's permission. This interim measure protects the petitioner's interests pending full hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/8216/2026
The Gujarat High Court issued notice to the Income Tax Officer Ward 3(2)(1) with the next hearing on 21.07.2026. The Court permitted the assessment to continue but imposed a crucial restriction: no final order can be passed without the Court's permission. This interim measure protects the petitioner's interests pending full hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts