MAYA DEVI W/O BHARATLAL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7559/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227,14,19,21. Status: 125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 03rd September 2026.
CNR: GJHC240351932026
Filing Number
SCR.A/20380/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/7559/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAYA DEVI W/O BHARATLAL
Adv. MR PARTH D PATEL(
-
2.,MR VINEET P SHETH(
-
3.,MR VINEET P SHETH(
-
4., ,MR VINEET P SHETH(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.PRAVINBHAI BHIKHABHAI BAGDA
Adv. NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(
Case History
-
03-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Sep-2026
125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF
Case Summary: The Gujarat High Court issued a notice in a quashing petition filed by Maya Devi (accused no. 3 as company director in a cheque-related complaint). The court granted ad-interim relief under para-8(B) till the next hearing, noting the petitioner was not the cheque signatory and the complaint contained no allegations of her involvement in day-to-day company affairs. Notice returnable on 03.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCR.A/7559/2026
Case Summary: The Gujarat High Court issued a notice in a quashing petition filed by Maya Devi (accused no. 3 as company director in a cheque-related complaint). The court granted ad-interim relief under para-8(B) till the next hearing, noting the petitioner was not the cheque signatory and the complaint contained no allegations of her involvement in day-to-day company affairs. Notice returnable on 03.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts