MAYA DEVI W/O BHARATLAL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/7559/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227,14,19,21. Next hearing: 03rd September 2026.
CNR: GJHC240351932026
Next Hearing
03rd September 2026
Filing Number
SCR.A/20380/2026
Filing Date
04-05-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/7559/2026
Registration Date
29-05-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAYA DEVI W/O BHARATLAL
Adv. MR PARTH D PATEL(
,MR VINEET P SHETH(
,MR VINEET P SHETH(
, ,MR VINEET P SHETH(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
PRAVINBHAI BHIKHABHAI BAGDA
Adv. NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
529-FOR ADMISSION
3600-FRESH MATTERS
125-NOTICE RETURNABLE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
| 08-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 03-09-2026 | 125-NOTICE RETURNABLE & ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: The Gujarat High Court issued a notice in a quashing petition filed by Maya Devi (accused no. 3 as company director in a cheque-related complaint). The court granted ad-interim relief under para-8(B) till the next hearing, noting the petitioner was not the cheque signatory and the complaint contained no allegations of her involvement in day-to-day company affairs. Notice returnable on 03.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Gujarat High Court issued a notice in a quashing petition filed by Maya Devi (accused no. 3 as company director in a cheque-related complaint). The court granted ad-interim relief under para-8(B) till the next hearing, noting the petitioner was not the cheque signatory and the complaint contained no allegations of her involvement in day-to-day company affairs. Notice returnable on 03.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts