ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs THAKOR CHETANJI UDAJI Advocate - null( — FA/2299/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act-1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240347192026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
FA/14652/2026
Filing Date
02-05-2026
Registration No
FA/2299/2026
Registration Date
27-05-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
285-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 ( 285 )
Sub-Category
2081-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 - COMPENSATION - UNDER SECTION - 166 - INJURY ( 2081 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. MR CHIRAYU A MEHTA(
Respondent(s)
THAKOR CHETANJI UDAJI Advocate - null(
JENAJI PUNAJI THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: FA/2299/2026 ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Thakor Chetanji Udaji & Anr. The High Court of Gujarat admitted ICICI Lombard's First Appeal and granted a stay of the lower tribunal's judgment and award on condition that the appellant deposits 100% of the awarded amount within four weeks. Upon deposit, 30% shall be released to the original claimant, while the remaining 70% must be invested in a fixed deposit with a nationalized bank for five years (renewable until final appeal disposal), held by the Tribunal's Nazir Branch without permitting loans against it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Case Summary: FA/2299/2026 ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Thakor Chetanji Udaji & Anr. The High Court of Gujarat admitted ICICI Lombard's First Appeal and granted a stay of the lower tribunal's judgment and award on condition that the appellant deposits 100% of the awarded amount within four weeks. Upon deposit, 30% shall be released to the original claimant, while the remaining 70% must be invested in a fixed deposit with a nationalized bank for five years (renewable until final appeal disposal), held by the Tribunal's Nazir Branch without permitting loans against it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts