MAHIRKHAN IRSHADKHAN PATHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/11046/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240347022026
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
CR.MA/20053/2026
Filing Date
02-05-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/11046/2026
Registration Date
05-05-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER
Coram
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
2 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF COMPLAINT ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHIRKHAN IRSHADKHAN PATHAN
Adv. MR.RAJESH P VYAS(
,MS. KRUTIKA K. BHATT(
,MS. KRUTIKA K. BHATT(
, ,MS. KRUTIKA K. BHATT(
MAZHARKHAN IRSHADKHAN PATHAN
Adv. MR.RAJESH P VYAS(
IRSHADKHAN ISMAILKHAN PATHAN
Adv. MR.RAJESH P VYAS(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
MOHAMMEDFAIZAN ABDULKADAR SHEIKH
Adv. NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER
3600-FRESH MATTERS
125-NOTICE RETURNABLE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 18-06-2026 | 125-NOTICE RETURNABLE & ADJOURNED MATTERS |
| 08-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
In this criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside an FIR/Order, the High Court of Gujarat accepted the affidavit of applicant No.2 and adjourned the case to 18.06.2026. The State waived service of notice, and the original complainant's advocate filed appearance in registry. No substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In this criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside an FIR/Order, the High Court of Gujarat accepted the affidavit of applicant No.2 and adjourned the case to 18.06.2026. The State waived service of notice, and the original complainant's advocate filed appearance in registry. No substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts